NewDelhi: The Supreme Court-appointed panel has found that nearly 86% of farmers supported the now-repealed three central farm laws that were at the centre of year-long protest by various farmer outfits.
“Around 85.7 per cent of the farmer organisations, representing more than 3.3 crore farmers, supported the farm laws,” the panel said in its findings. The bilateral interactions of the panel with the stakeholders demonstrated that only 13.3 per cent of the stakeholders were not in favour of the three laws.
Interestingly, the SC-appointed panel was not in favour of a total repeal of the three controversial farm laws and instead had suggested leaving procurement of crops at a specified price to the states and scrapping of the Essential Commodities Act.
This was revealed by one of the three members of the panel on Monday while releasing the committee’s report. The other two members – economist Ashok Gulati and agri-economist Pramod Kumar Joshi – were not present at a hurriedly called press conference here.
Pune-based farmer leader Anil Ghanwat said he had on three occasions written to the Supreme Court for releasing the report of the committee but in the absence of a response, he was releasing it on his own.
According to him, the committee has said that a “repeal or a long suspension of these laws would be unfair to the silent majority who support the farm laws.” The panel favoured giving some flexibility in implementation and designs of the laws.
The panel had submitted its recommendations on the three farm laws, which among other things, allowed farmers to sell agri produce to private entities outside the government mandis, on March 19, 2021. The three farm laws were repealed by the Narendra Modi government in November last year, ahead of assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab.
Addressing the press conference, Ghanwat said the committee had also suggested many changes in the laws, including giving freedom to states to make the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system legal.
The panel had also suggested that the open-ended procurement policy should be discontinued and a model contract agreement should be formulated. The report has no relevance now as the laws have been repealed but it would help in making policies for the agriculture sector in future, said Ghanwat, who is the President of Swatantra Bharat Party.
Besides feedback from those who made personal depositions, the panel also received comments on the three laws through an online portal where around two-thirds of the respondents favoured the legislations. The feedback received through e-mails also showed that a majority support the laws. Ghanwat said 40 unions, which had organised agitations against the laws under the banner of Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), did not make any submission despite repeated requests.
On November 19, 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the withdrawal of the three farm laws, saying the government could not convince protesting farmers about the benefits of reforms.
The repealing of the three farm legislations — Farmer’s Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act; The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Act; and The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act — was one of the key demands of around 40 farmer unions protesting against these reforms at Delhi borders.
The protest started at the fag-end of November 2020 and ended after Parliament repealed the three laws. The legislation had come into force in June 2020 through an ordinance and later, they were cleared by Parliament in September 2020. Ultimately, the laws were repealed in November 2021 although the Supreme Court had stayed the implementation of the legislations as well as ordered setting up of the panel in January 2021.
On the farmer unions’ demand to legalise the MSP system, the panel said in its report that the demand was not based on sound logic and was infeasible to implement. The MSP and procurement support policy, as was designed for cereals during the Green Revolution time, needs to be revisited given that huge surpluses of wheat and rice have emerged.
The committee recommended that procurement of crops at a declared MSP can be the prerogative of the states as per their specific agricultural policy priorities. “The states can provide for legal backing for such procurements at their own costs – as the recent Punjab Amendment Act does. Kerala, as an example, has recently announced MSP for fruits and vegetables. Some states also announce bonus on the MSP announced by the Centre,” it said.
Another option suggested by the panel was to give freedom of choice to beneficiaries of PDS to choose cash transfers equivalent to MSP + 25 per cent for every kg of grain entitlement or get it in kind (wheat or rice).
Bureau Report
Leave a Reply