Nepal’s constitutional stand-off: Under cover of fog,villagers on borders are evading the fuel blocking

#Kathmandu: Nepal Amendments to a new constitution fail to appease dissenting lowlanders, Trouble in the basement ,EVEN without the Terai plain’s winter fogs that cling to the flat borderlands between Nepal and India, the villages on either side of the frontier look much the same: dusty lanes lined with houses made of mud, bamboo and tin. But the fog has its uses. Since protesters against a new Nepali constitution began blocking roads from India in September, enterprising villagers have risen before the rooster crows, slipped on motorbikes across to India, and returned with a jerry can of fuel or a cylinder of cooking gas before the fog disperses.

In just four months the smuggling has encroached on a state monopoly to the point of supplying half the fuel for this poor, landlocked country. It is a parable of the mess Nepal is in. Despite being members of the same lowland ethnic groups, known broadly as Madhesis—who make up about a third of the country’s population of 30m and whose leaders agitate for greater constitutional rights—the smugglers have done more than anything to weaken the Madhesis’ hand. In the Nepali capital, Kathmandu, which nestles in the uplands and whose long domination the lowlanders resent, the price of petrol has slid from $5 a litre at the height of the blockade in November to around $2.50 now. The smugglers are subverting the subverters.

Yet the blockade has had an effect. On January 23rd the three main (and largely upland) parties in Nepal’s ruling coalition abruptly pushed through parliament amendments to a constitution promulgated, over Madhesi objections, only in September. The changes go some way to meeting the lowlanders’ demands for the political representation they feel they were promised. Under the new rules, the Terai region will now get around half of the parliamentary seats. The amendments promise (vaguely) to attach greater importance to population than to geography when fixing constituency boundaries. They also ensure a share of state jobs and favours to politically marginalised groups, in place of a fuzzy promise of “inclusion”. A new process for delimiting electoral districts should also help Madhesis.

The UN secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, welcomed the changes. So did India, the regional superpower and Nepal’s lifeline. Its government had encouraged the border blockade, partly out of sympathy with Madhesis, many of whom have kin on the Indian side, but also out of fear that Kathmandu’s obstinate elites might tip Nepal into another round of strife—the country is recovering from years of turmoil, including a long insurgency by Maoist guerrillas. Fragmented by caste, religion and language as well as by region, ethnicity, spectacularly rugged terrain and politics, Nepalese society remains fragile. So does its government: C.K. Lal, an acerbic commentator, describes the ruling alliance as a “fascistic formation consisting of malignant monarchists, malicious Maoists and malevolent Marxist-Leninists—each one masquerading as nationalists.”

Previous governments have also been inept, but the death and destruction from an earthquake last April have cast the current lot in unflattering relief. Of some $1.9 billion pledged in foreign aid for the current fiscal year, which began last July, the state has not spent even one-twentieth. A special state agency created to organise earthquake relief and reconstruction has yet to choose a logo, let alone begin work. Crucial development projects, including roads and hydroelectric schemes, remain on hold, starved of either bureaucratic approval or supplies. Tourism is at a six-year low, and investment has shrivelled.

Small wonder that the government turns a blind eye to the smugglers who have kept Nepal afloat. Some Madhesis are not so happy with them; border protesters have on occasion set smuggled fuel on fire. Nor are the main Madhesi parties content. They say the constitutional changes fail to meet their main demand, which is to divide the region into no more than two provinces and grant them more local power. With the blockade less effective, they are looking for other ways to make their point. And with tempers still running high, Nepal’s troubles are not yet over. By Agencies.