New Delhi: Asking the Tamil Nadu government to chin up and face criticism of its policies, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said no other State in the country seemed to have filed so many criminal defamation cases, that too using the state machinery and the public prosecutor’s office, in the recent past.
A Bench led by Justice Dipak Misra perused the history of defamation cases filed in the past five years and said criminal defamation cases were filed even for reports about the Chief Minister’s health condition.
“This is not the way… this is not the sign of a healthy democracy. This shows State’s control over the sanctioning authority and prosecutor’s office in filing defamation cases against opponents, media and political rivals,” Justice Misra observed orally.
“If somebody criticizes the policy of the government, if the person criticised is a public figure, he has to face it instead of using the state machinery to choke criticism,” the Bench observed.
The court issued fresh notice to the Tamil Nadu government and authorities and directed them to file their responses on the issue within three weeks. The court then posted a hearing after five weeks.
On August 17, 2016, the Tamil Nadu government had provided the Supreme Court with a list of defamation cases filed by the State through the public prosecutor for the past five years.
The list shows a spectrum of cases filed against the DMK, the DMDK, the Congress party, the media and BJP leader Subramanian Swamy.
The 70-page list in a tabular form is titled the “list of defamation cases filed by the Government of Tamil Nadu for defamatory speeches made against Honourable Chief Minister from May 16, 2011 to July 28, 2016”.
A broad count of the list shows that a total 213 criminal defamation cases have been filed by the State. Of this, 85 were registered against the DMK, 48 against the DMDK, 55 against media persons, seven against the Congress and five against Mr. Swamy.
The submission of the list was based on a July 28, 2016 order by the court, which was alarmed by the row of criminal defamation cases unleashed on political opponents of Ms. Jayalalithaa through the state machinery.
This was barely 10 days after apex court sought a personal explanation from Ms. Jayalalithaa about the series of criminal defamation cases being lodged against political opponents in the State.
The Bench was hearing a criminal defamation case filed against DMDK leader Vijayakanth through the local public prosecutor on the State government’s sanction against his remarks during a public event in Tirupur district on November 6, 2015.
During an earlier hearing on a similar defamation case against Mr. Vijayakanth for remarks made in Dharmapuri district, Justice Misra had orally observed that a “public prosecutor is not a postman” to settle political scores.
Bureau Report
Leave a Reply